Back to blogContact Center

Contact Center KPIs: 6 Essential Metrics You Must Measure [2026]

KPIs de contact center: dashboard con métricas FCR, AHT, NPS, CSAT y tasa de abandono

What isn't measured can't be improved. A contact center generates thousands of daily interactions, but without the right KPIs, you're operating blind: you don't know if your agents are performing, if your customers are satisfied, or if your cost per interaction is sustainable. These are the six metrics every contact center must monitor in 2026, with reference benchmarks and the real impact artificial intelligence is having on each one. If you're looking for a complete ecosystem view, check our contact center guide.

1. First Contact Resolution (FCR)

FCR (First Contact Resolution) measures the percentage of inquiries resolved in the first interaction, without the customer needing to contact again. It's the most revealing KPI of a contact center's operational effectiveness.

Benchmark: 70-75%. Best-in-class operations exceed 80%.

Each recontact costs between 7 and 12 euros in agent time, queue management, and satisfaction erosion. Low FCR not only drives up costs; according to Forrester, it's the factor most correlated with customer dissatisfaction. If a problem isn't resolved the first time, churn probability multiplies.

The levers to improve FCR are three: continuous agent training, immediate access to an updated knowledge base, and L1 query automation. AI agents resolve frequent questions, status inquiries, and simple transactions without human intervention, freeing the team for complex cases. According to McKinsey, human agents assisted by AI improve their FCR by 15-20% because they access contextual suggestions in real time. More details on this technology in our AI contact center guide.

2. Average Handle Time (AHT)

AHT (Average Handle Time) is the sum of talk time, hold time, and after-call work. It's the oldest operational metric in the sector and remains fundamental for team sizing and WFM planning.

Benchmark: 6-8 minutes (varies significantly by industry and complexity).

There's a classic trap here: reducing AHT at the expense of quality is counterproductive. An agent who hangs up quickly but doesn't resolve generates a recontact that doubles the cost. The right approach isn't to speed up the conversation, but to eliminate unproductive time. After-call work--notes, classification, CRM updates--consumes 2-4 minutes per interaction. AI automatic summarization (AI summarization) transcribes the conversation and generates notes automatically, saving 2-3 minutes per contact without compromising quality. To understand how this technology integrates, check the key contact center technologies.

3. Net Promoter Score (NPS) and CSAT

NPS and CSAT measure customer perception, not operational efficiency. They're metrics complementary to process KPIs.

NPS (Net Promoter Score) answers one question: "From 0 to 10, how likely are you to recommend this company". Promoters (9-10) minus detractors (0-6) give an index from -100 to +100. Benchmark: above 50 is excellent; the service sector average is around 30-40.

CSAT (Customer Satisfaction Score) measures immediate satisfaction after an interaction: "From 1 to 5, how satisfied are you". Benchmark: above 4.2 out of 5.

Both metrics should be tracked alongside operational KPIs because an operation can be efficient in times and resolution, but leave the customer dissatisfied due to tone, lack of empathy, or rigid processes. Well-trained AI agents maintain a consistent quality level in every interaction--no bad days, no fatigue--which according to Salesforce data improves NPS by 10-15 points. To dive deeper into the relationship between satisfaction and retention, check our customer success metrics guide.

4. Abandonment Rate

Abandonment rate measures the percentage of customers who hang up or abandon the channel before being served by an agent. It's the most direct thermometer of the contact center's capacity to manage demand.

Benchmark: less than 5%. The industry average sits between 8% and 12%.

The main cause is single: excessive wait times. Solutions are cumulative. Scheduled callback allows the customer to book a return call instead of waiting in queue. AI agents absorb L1 inquiries and reduce queue volume by 30-50%. Well-designed self-service diverts queries that don't require human intervention.

There's one channel that changes the rules: WhatsApp. Unlike phone, communication via WhatsApp Business API is asynchronous. The customer sends their message and continues with their day; there's no queue, no wait, no abandonment. It's a structural advantage that explains why the WhatsApp channel registers practically zero abandonment rates versus 8-12% for phone.

5. Customer Effort Score (CES)

CES (Customer Effort Score) asks the customer: "From 1 to 7, how much effort did it take to resolve your problem". It's a less known metric than NPS or CSAT, but according to Gartner, it's the most reliable predictor of future purchase behavior.

Benchmark: above 5.5 out of 7.

The logic is direct: low effort generates loyalty; high effort generates abandonment. A customer who repeated their problem to three agents, was transferred twice, and waited 15 minutes won't return, even if they eventually resolved the case.

AI agents reduce effort structurally: they resolve without transfers, without repeating information, and without waits. CRM context is available from the first second. To understand how a contact center works that minimizes customer effort, review our architecture guide.

6. Cost Per Contact

Cost per contact divides total operational cost by the number of managed interactions. It's the financial KPI that connects contact center operations with the company's P&L.

Benchmark by channel:

  • Phone: 8-15 euros
  • Email: 5-8 euros
  • Live chat: 3-6 euros
  • WhatsApp with AI: 0.50-2 euros

This is the KPI where artificial intelligence has the most quantifiable impact. According to IBM data, each automated interaction saves an average of 5.50 euros versus human handling. It's not about eliminating agents, but redirecting repetitive volume to AI agents that operate 24/7 at a fraction of the cost, while the human team concentrates on complex cases.

Benchmarks Summary Table

KPIBenchmarkBest-in-ClassAI Impact
FCR70-75%80%++15-20% with AI assistance
AHT6-8 min4-6 min-2-3 min in after-call work
NPS30-4050++10-15 points
CSAT4.0/54.2+/5Consistency in every interaction
Abandonment rate8-12%<5%-30-50% queue volume
CES5.0/75.5+/7Resolution without transfers
Cost per contact5-15 euros<3 euros-5.50 euros per automated interaction

Conclusion

The six KPIs cover the three dimensions of a contact center: operational efficiency (FCR, AHT), customer perception (NPS, CSAT, CES), and financial sustainability (cost per contact). Measuring them is the first step; improving them is where AI makes the difference. For a complete view, check our contact center guide and the customer success guide.

GuruSup deploys AI agents on WhatsApp and web chat that improve your KPIs from day one: higher FCR, lower abandonment rate, cost per contact below 2 euros, and effortless resolution for the customer. Try GuruSup free.

Related articles